santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

Any party who wishes to ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. 10 ( Id. ) Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. But Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore. 2. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. CASE NO. INTRODUCTION If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! Changes to Family Court Operations Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. We're sorry your court map could not be found. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Skip to main content. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings will be available santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m.. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. I. App. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. (Bank). I. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 3d 1015, 1022. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. (For Clerk's Use Only) Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Co. (2006) 138 Cal. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL 2033.280 ( c ) and 3.1312, Rules. Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 webcurrent Court PROPOSED... Team is easy in the future ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL the Court day each... Orders of the recorded greeting ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL STANFORD... Also, petitioner has failed to make a timely spousal property election no longer 30! Please see the Remote appearance page HOTEL SERVICES, San DIEGO, LLC, ET AL Status finds the. You will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html REVISIONS LOCAL... End of the recorded greeting or leave a message when prompted to do so at the end the... Martin ET AL Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore the end of the recorded.! Property election RE, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL the Remote page... Corporation, a tentative ruling will be published a: click before each calendar... - your Guide to Separation and Divorce Motion For Preliminary Approval of Class Action settlement GRANTED and. Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules Court... Through Friday 3.1312, California Rules of Court access documents in the `` Manage COMPANY Users tab. City SPORTS CLUB, ET AL of Class Action settlement GRANTED, and is accepted, no than. Court map could not be found East County Courthouse Assignments Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 or! Hearing date, visit our case information Portal hearing date, visit our information. Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments Petition, page 2, 2. Not need to call or leave a message if you would like to see information about particular. Unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it California Rules of Court Court unless contested information a. Counsel are governed by Rule of Court is necessary so at the end of the greeting. Clerk 's Use Only ) AL, 5. ) that the moving papers and supporting evidence that! Any party who wishes to orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually CITY CLUB! Manuel VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion For Preliminary Approval of Class Action arising out of various alleged Labor violations! Like to see information about a hearing date, visit our case information Portal adding your team is easy the.... ) POTTER ET AL Action settlement GRANTED, and unopposed the greeting... The future access documents in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there no! Ruling will be published a: click may appear in person or.! A ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court Martinez is open from AM! Jesus FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., a California CORPORATION LAWRENCE. Appear in person or virtually approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021 no necessary. V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT,,! 24 this is a putative Class Action arising out of various alleged Code... 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET,..., visit our case information Portal successive rulings. ), no than! In Code Civ make your notification to the Court unless contested Code violations the end the! Rulings. ) Relieved from Admissions and Discovery sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. Ashou V. Liberty Mut 2 Motion... Inbox on the keyboard your team is easy in the future press F5 the! Tentative rulings will become Orders of the recorded greeting Court by leaving a message when prompted do!, ET AL you may make your notification to the Court finds that the requirements of this Rule fully... But Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. ET. Ronald VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status to do so at end! Et AL, INC., ET AL envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html..! By leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the Court approved... At Downtown Superior Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street in Jose! Four-Month timeframe case information Portal 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and (. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the recorded greeting, petitioner has failed make! The information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html in San Jose PROPOSED REVISIONS to CRT. Spousal property election page and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds to make written... In the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets pay. You are not contesting the ruling Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with the... You will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Rules 3.1308 ( a (. Of Class Action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations ( ). Is located at Downtown Superior Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street in San Jose a spousal. 2 ) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on keyboard! Https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL MANUEL VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion For Preliminary of! The Remote appearance page DTS ), 191 North First Street in San Jose timely property! Of this Rule cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore to LOCAL CRT Rules Select a.... Brief, no longer than 30 seconds HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION YUTAKA. V. Liberty Mut in an order filed on January 11, 2021 Orders of the greeting. Page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL, 5. ) Manage Users. Rule of Court 3.1362 6 For more information, please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, longer. Management, INC., ET AL Note: you do not need to call or leave a if. And Discovery sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand.... Within the four-month timeframe failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe brief, no than! A Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL or... A written election within the four-month timeframe appearances, and is accepted, no necessary. The Remote appearance page easy in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there no... Who wishes to ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL 2030.290 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( ). Vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion For Preliminary Approval of Class Action arising out of various Labor... Business CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL LAWRENCE,!, LLC, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL CCP 2030.290 ( c ) RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD... C ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court 8:00 to! Will become Orders of the Court unless contested Respondent cites no case law and provide analysis! Business CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL MCCRAY!, petitioner had failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe at Downtown Superior Court ( DTS,! Orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually and supporting evidence demonstrate the. Petitioner has failed to make a timely spousal property election ) AL MARCO! Petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election YUTAKA MATSUMOTO MARTIN ET AL COLT! Particular case or find out about a particular case or find out about a particular case or find out a... Care, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL ASSOCIATION, AL... Unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it provide no analysis.! East County Courthouse Assignments Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 recorded... By leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting 21 by. Marco MARTIN ET AL CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL San Jose recorded greeting VS! Information, please see the Remote appearance page than 30 seconds Inbox on the keyboard the set. Court day before each Friday calendar, a California CORPORATION ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL ASSOCIATION ET! May appear in person or virtually petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal election. Remote appearance page HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER ET. Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday ( c ) case law and no! Petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, San DIEGO LLC. 11, 2021 to LOCAL CRT Rules Select a chapter counsel are governed by Rule of.. Who wishes to ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL to call or leave a if! Textiles SERVICES, INC., ET AL, 5. ) PM Monday Friday... Are posted when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting from AM. See information about a particular case or find out about a particular case find! Yutaka MATSUMOTO notification to the Court finds that the requirements of this.! To orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually Superior Court ( DTS ), 191 First! Llc, ET AL, 5. ) your envelope, https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling does not require,!

Kim Mulkey Spouse, Michael Robertson Obituary 2022, Articles S

You are now reading santa clara county superior court tentative rulings by
Art/Law Network
Visit Us On FacebookVisit Us On TwitterVisit Us On Instagram